METH: menace or medicine?

In recent years amphetamine, particularly METH (methamphetamine), has received considerable, negative media attention. You may read about police raiding a secret METH lab in your local newspaper, hear that METH is stealing our youth in a news report, or see anti-drug commercials portraying the dark and destructive forces of METH abuse. What you are unlikely to see are reports highlighting the benefits of METH. Yes, I used the words benefit and METH in the same sentence. While METH is relentlessly demonized in main stream media as the the devil’s drug, a less satanic perspective has been taken up by many neuroscientists.

Continue reading

Posted in Biological Psychology | 7 Comments

iPads vs. Adventures: Negative Stereotypes of Materialism

Suppose you’re sitting around one night and log in to Facebook.  You scan through your friends’ status updates, and notice one person excitedly trumpeting the arrival of their new iPad 2, chattering about all the cool features.  Maybe you’re not really much of a computer person, and you know this person already had one of the first iPads, so you find yourself rolling your eyes in annoyance at their post and quickly moving on.  Scrolling further down, you see photos from another friend’s recent backpacking adventure through South America.  You click through their photos with interest, and maybe even make a few comments, sharing their excitement about the trip.

Think about your reactions to these two Facebook posts.  Both friends’ posts involved expensive purchases of one kind or another – the first friend spent money on a new gadget, which you may have felt was an unnecessary splurge.  But the second friend spent money on a trip, and indeed probably shelled out more for their international journey than the first friend spent on the iPad.  So why would you feel differently about the two of them? Continue reading

Posted in Consumer Psychology, Social Psychology | 4 Comments

Who’s Problem? Screening for Interpersonal Violence in ERs

A pregnant woman comes into an emergency room on a weekend evening. She reports that she fell on her stomach and is worried about her unborn child. The woman also has some minor bruising around her wrists and arms not consistent with this most recent injury. Is it the responsibility of an emergency room physician to screen this woman for interpersonal violence, more commonly referred to as domestic violence? Continue reading

Posted in Community Psychology | 1 Comment

Does your Wii know you’re lying?

Your mother always told you not to lie: it’s easier to tell the truth. She wasn’t pulling your leg: Duran, Dale, and McNamara (2010) recently showed that lying can physically pull you in two directions. And they did it with a Wii.

Continue reading

Posted in Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

We won. They lost.

Let’s start off this post with an exercise in imagination.

Imagine that we happen to be big fans of the same team.

First, imagine that our favorite team is the underdog in a major sports competition – say, the NCAA basketball tournament. People didn’t really expect that we’d win anything. Yet we manage to win game after game, eventually beating a top-ranked team. The National Championship is so close, we can almost taste it.

 

Now imagine a different scenario: Our team is actually ranked #1, and they’re heavily favored to win. Experts said that the road to victory was basically paved for them, especially after several of the other early favorites were defeated in earlier rounds. But in a jaw-dropping upset, they lose to an 11th ranked, barely-known team.

 

What jumps out at you about those two scenarios?

One tells the story of underdog triumph – the other of stunning defeat.

One team is a well-known basketball empire – the other is a relative unknown whose success in this year’s tournament sent thousands of college basketball fans to their Google search engines just to find out who they were.

But there’s something you may not have noticed that means just as much to the story –

The pronouns.

Continue reading

Posted in Social Psychology | 2 Comments

Are you smarter than a 6-month-old? Evidence from an iconic memory capacity test

Imagine several colored stars appear in front of you for 1 second, how many stars can you remember and tell its color based on that one glance? Do you know if you can perform better than a 6-month-old infant in this test? We may get an answer from this study in which psychologists for the first time measured infants’ iconic memory.

Iconic memory is the initial 0.2 to 0.5 seconds after you visually perceive an item. Have you ever tried to look at the list of side effects displayed so quickly in some pharmaceutical commercials? Without the ability to recall much, you only got a feeling that you have seen more than you could remember. That is a close example of the feelings of iconic memory.

Continue reading

Posted in Cognitive Psychology, Developmental Psychology | 1 Comment

Going to child care: a “popular” path?

What kind of children would you guess to be popular at school? You may intuitively assume children’s popularity is related to their being stylish, good looking, athletic, funny, or wealthy. One factor that you probably won’t think of is how many hours per week they spent in child care when they were little.

A recent study found that children with extensive experience of early child care tend to be popular when they are in elementary school. But before you rush to sign your child up for child care, please let me finish telling you the complete story: popularity also comes with aggression in children who spent a lot of time in early child care.

Continue reading

Posted in Developmental Psychology, Educational psychology | 3 Comments

Eyes on the back of your head

When you’re sitting in a public place, do you ever “feel someone looking at you” — and then turn around to find out it’s true? In the scientific community, people have investigated whether it’s possible to sense when a person is looking at you. The resounding answer from these studies is “no”. And still, plenty of people still post to sites like Yahoo Answers speculating that “brain waves” can cause it to happen. Why is the belief of a “sixth sense for staring” so hard to shake off?

Robert Sheldrake is partly responsible for this kind of belief sticking around. He published a book claiming that subjects in his experiments could detect staring better than if they were randomly guessing. Subsequently, several researchers tried to reproduce his results — and the majority of them weren’t able to. This back-and-forth was covered in a 2005 issue of Scientific American, and in the science blogging community. When the “staring sense” was debunked so publicly, why didn’t this become part of mainstream knowledge?

The problem is that although the unreliability of Sheldrake’s results was reported on, they were in Scientific American — not a magazine that everybody subscribes to. And while science blogging is aiming at educating people in a more accessible way, it’s not clear who the readers acually are. Scientists need to come up with more ways for communicating with the public when they *know* that they have people’s attention.

Another problem is that Sheldrake’s book is still out there for anyone to read. And people are reading it and being convinced by his arguments, as just one personal blog post shows. People have a hard time telling apart real science and pseudo-science — perhaps teaching this skill is something that should be emphasized more in school. And of course, people are much more impressed by a positive finding (like Sheldrake’s studies) than by people who aren’t able to reproduce that finding (an issue recently discussed at the science blog The Invisible Gorilla).

Perhaps the strongest reason for why many people still believe in a sixth sense for staring is that it’s such a widespread phenomenon. Of course, it can be explained by the fact that people who turn around after thinking they’re being started at actually get stares because of their head-turning. But who wants to listen to logic when there’s hope of a sixth sense?

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Visual clutter: It’s worse than you think

Take a look at your desk—is it full of junk?  If so, you may be thinking that, while it’s not an ideal situation, your messy desk isn’t so bad.  Sure, it takes you a little longer to find stuff, but you know where the important things are, right?  But when you stop and think about it, how do you actually feel when your desk or room is cluttered?  Do you find it harder to focus, maybe even irritable?  Even you “organized clutter” folks probably feel this way from time to time.  As you might have guessed, these negative feelings may be related to how our brain responds when there’s just too much stuff—but how does this happen?  And is clutter really that bad?

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Basketball: It’s A Pretty ‘Touchy’ Subject.

Some basketball players really like touching their teammates.

Of course, when I say ‘touch,’ I mean gestures like high fives and half hugs. No matter how macho they may seem, basketball players touch their teammates in all sorts of ways during games. But is there a point to all of that fist bumping and chest punching? Continue reading

Posted in Sensation & Perception, Social Psychology | 2 Comments