Elements of style: How science informs fashion design

How do people judge fashion design?  Fashion experts are notorious for using vague criteria, saying things like “I know it when I see it.”  This kind of response implies that good design can’t be analyzed objectively.  In a recent interview, Project Runway’s Tim Gunn even claims that people should avoid consciously analyzing fashion:

Smithsonian Magazine: How do you recognize good design?

Tim Gunn: It’s largely visceral, to be perfectly honest. If my brain tells me that a new design should resonate with me, but I’m unmoved, then I always go with my gut. I was talking to faculty members at the Parsons School for Design, where I taught for 24 years. They were telling me about how they initially evaluate a new object. They come upon it not really looking at it. They see it in the periphery of their vision and then they look at it for a split second and close their eyes. It’s that moment of reckoning that tells them the value of the object.

Read more

Tim’s response suggests that categorizing a look as “good fashion” results from snap judgments about its visual elements.  But what drives this gut feeling about good design?  On Project Runway, the judges often critique the perceptual elements of a look, saying things like, “it’s too busy,” “it’s not cohesive,” or ,”I HATE that color!”  So are there objective, perceptual rules that good fashion adheres to?  Or do you have to be a fashion expert to “know it when you see it?”

Here’s one illusion that could speak to this issue: which inner square is smaller?

For most people, the inner black square appears smaller than the inner white one.  In reality, the squares are the same size. This illusion could explain why we think black is more flattering than white; black shapes appear thinner than white shapes, possibly because the contours of black objects have more definition.

This illusion suggests that color is one element that can influence fashion judgements.  Although color trends come and go (apparently, this year it’s all about rust and citrus), red and black are two hues that may stand the test of time in fashion.  I posted last week about how men and women both prefer red on the opposite sex (Eliot, 2008; Eliot, 2010).  Referees also awarded red-clothed Tae Kwon Do competitors more points than when the same competitors wore blue, possibly because red might be easier for referees to see (Strauss et al., 2008). However, not all color biases are positive; referees also gave out more penalties to football and hockey teams wearing black, perhaps because people associate ‘black’ with hostility (Frank & Gilovich, 1988).  This all suggests that color not only influences whether we like what others wear, but also how we perceive performance and character traits.  But how do people judge colors in the absence of context (such as attraction or competition)?  Do colors change the way we feel (i.e., more confident wearing red or more aggressive wearing black), leading to positive or negative judgments?

Designers also commonly use illusions to “trick the eye” into perceiving a more flattering silhouette, such as highlighting the waist with a belt to draw attention to the narrowest part of the body.  Another trick is to wear V-neck tops, which gives the illusion of a longer torso.  Don’t believe me?  Check out the following image; which line segment is longer?

The lines are actually identical (really!), but the line segment on the right looks longer because of the V-shaped extensions on either side.  You can achieve the exact same effect just by wearing a V-neck shirt or dress (and, theoretically, bell-bottom pants or mermaid skirts). So why does a longer torso matter?

As it turns out, elongating the body makes you look thinner.  When people were shown pairs of bodies that differed only in height, participants thought that the taller body looked thinner over 80% of the time, despite the fact that they were the same width (Savazzi et al., 2010).

Thus, fashion experts could be basing their judgments on basic perceptual elements like color and height.  If perceptual elements influence fashion judgments, we can pinpoint why a look appears unflattering, too busy, incohesive, etc.  Ultimately, judging fashion may be less an art than a science.

Let’s put this theory to a test with one last illusion.  Which of these two women looks thinner to you?If you think you know the answer, feel free to leave a comment and tune in next week for the results!

Elliot AJ, Kayser DN, Greitemeyer T, Lichtenfeld S, Gramzow RH, Maier MA, & Liu H (2010). Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 139 (3), 399-417 PMID: 20677892

Elliot, A., & Niesta, D. (2008). Romantic red: Red enhances men’s attraction to women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (5), 1150-1164 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150

Frank, M., & Gilovich, T. (1988). The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (1), 74-85 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.74

Beck, D.M., Emanuele, B., & Savazzi, S. (2010). Why women wear heels: a new size illusion? Journal of Vision, 10 (7) : 10.1167/10.7.965

About Audrey Lustig

Audrey Lustig received a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania where she conducted research with Amishi Jha. She is a fifth-year graduate student in cognitive neuroscience at the University of Illinois where she works with Diane Beck. She specializes in visual perception, attention and neuroimaging.
This entry was posted in Sensation & Perception. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Elements of style: How science informs fashion design

  1. Julie says:

    I know vertical stripes are supposed to be slimming, but I actually think it’s the woman with the horizontal stripes (on the left) that looks thinner in this case. Maybe it has something to do with the sharply-defined contours?

    • sharda says:

      its the broad shiny vertical line on the horizontal lines making the figure look slimmer as compared to the vertical striped figure. what you learnt and observed is true.

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Elements of style: How science informs fashion design | ionpsych.com -- Topsy.com

  3. JL says:

    I also know the striped dress is supposed to look slimmer, but it doesn’t, because whoever did the two images made a grave error: The depth caused by the cylindric shine in the dress to the left makes Ms Left look thinner, and Ms Right fatter, because she looks heftier. IIRC it’s the same reason the camera normally adds pounds to the way you look: Humans normally perceive others with more depth, in real life, while as photos do not do the human body the same justice stereo vision does thus making them seem bigger in width. The next time, please either omit any fancy extra effects in order to properly execute the optical illusion correctly, or apply the same amount to both.

  4. Samantha Vimes says:

    You got the first two! They apparently didn’t realize that you did that on *purpose* (or I’ve been fooled). Miss Vertical, by wearing a design we know “ought” to make her look slimmer, but with flat lines that make her look contourless and measures out the spacing, looks fatter. Miss Horizontal, by wearing stripes that “ought” to make her look fatter, but breaking up the design with a prominent but cleverly acceptable vertical gradient, has the assist of our own skepticism of the horizontal effect as well as the boost from the gradient to slim her.
    I suspect the sheen of evening dress fabric is chosen to get that gradient effect in real life?

    I alway liked the way V-necks looked on me but never associated it with a height illusion. I’ll take a closer look next time– and wear them for my next job interview.

  5. Kristy Morman says:

    I would love to study the science of fashion! Can you give me details on how to get started? I love fashion and would like to become a consultant.

  6. Audrey Lustig says:

    @Kristy: To be honest, there really isn’t much of a literature on the science of fashion, at least when it comes to vision science. Check out my other posts on wearing red and horizontal stripes for some more references, and good luck!

  7. DENNY says:

    Tim Gunn: It’s largely visceral, to be perfectly honest. If my brain tells me that a new design should resonate with me, but I’m unmoved, then I always go with my gut. I was talking to faculty members at the Parsons School forlebron 8 south beach , where I taught for 24 years. They were telling me about how they initially evaluate a new object. They come upon it not really looking at it. They see it in the periphery of their vision and then they look at it for a split second and close their eyes. It’s that moment of reckoning that tells them the value of the object.?

  8. Richard says:

    Why users still make use of to read news papers when in this technological globe everything is presented on web?

  9. Pingback: Science of Style: Black Really Does Make You Look Leaner—and Meaner

  10. Pingback: The Science of Style: How to Keep One New Year’s Resolution By Changing Your Neckline

  11. nicola says:

    I am very grateful such a post has been created. You know, I am just about to go to a fashion school in few months and I am so thrilled and all, but this post is very absorbing. It contains a lot of info necessary for me and my further education. Thank you very much!

    • ISUS says:

      Having perfect gerads and test scores doesn’t guarantee you’ll get into Stanford or UCLA, especially if you’re out of state for UCLA. USC and UCB are a bit easier to get into. But Stanford and UCLA are the top schools for what you’re planning.

  12. Pingback: When fashion meets science | African Science Heroes

  13. vanessa says:

    alex said no

  14. Pingback: Bright Futures | Should You Follow the Science Fashion of the Day?

  15. Rukimimekiku says:

    I think this site holds very great indited subject matter blog posts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>